Chance democratic

Chance democratic

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Review, Gordon F. Sander, Serling: The Rise and Twilight of Television’s Last Angry Man (Dutton, 1992)

Columbia Missourian, August 15, 1993

In 1956, television’s most successful writer, Rod Serling, wrote a teleplay for CBS’s United States Steel Hour based on the lynching of a 14-year-old black boy in Mississippi. The network balked, forcing Serling to make changes. As he later said, “the black [man] was changed to suggest ‘an unnamed foreigner,’ the locale was moved from the South to New England—I’m convinced they would have gone to Alaska or the North Pole and used Eskimos except that the costume problem was of sufficient severity not to attempt it. But it became a lukewarm, emasculated, vitiated kind of a show.”

The paradox of Serling’s career rests on the fact that he was committed to writing topical, controversial material, yet his talent was best suited for television, the most censored and regulated mass medium. As biographer Gordon Sander shows, Serling engaged in an ongoing battle with network censors, earning him the label “television’s last angry man.” Thus while Serling was winning six Emmy awards, the president of his own network was determined to drive him off the air.

Serling’s stroke of genius, what allowed him a respite from the censors, was his series The Twilight Zone (1959-1964). When he first announced his intention to do a fantasy series, many accused him of selling out. But The Twilight Zone allowed Serling to tackle issues like nuclear war, racism, blacklisting and lynching in allegorical fashion. As his wife, Carol, said, “Rod felt that drama should be an assertion of social conscience. He found that in The Twilight Zone, through parable and suggestion, he could make the same point that he wanted to make with straight drama.”

Sander traces Serling’s journey to The Twilight Zone in a way that highlights the major influences on his career. Except for a cloying, pretentious introduction in which, in New Journalism fashion, Sander reads himself into Serling’s thoughts at a certain point in his career, the author presents Serling’s life in a straightforward manner. He devotes chapters to Serling’s childhood in Binghampton, New York, his service as a paratrooper in World War II, his years at the liberal arts Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, and his early career in radio and television in Cincinnati, showing how these experiences shaped Serling’s art and world view.

In an excellent chapter on television’s short-lived “Golden Age,” Sander recreates the excitement surrounding the era when people were beginning to grasp the medium’s possibilities. At the center of this creativity were talented screenwriters such as Gore Vidal, Paddy Chayefsky, Earl Hamner, and Reginald Rose. According to director Arthur Penn, the principle for television’s success was to “get the good writers, and the good writers will bring the good actors, and the good actors will bring the good directors. And there we were, that’s how we became a circle. Each one of us would stimulate the other.”

Through the early years of television’s “Golden Age” Serling had built up a reputation as a talented screenwriter, but a success on the scale of Chayefsky’s 1953 drama Marty eluded him until 1955 when Kraft Television Theater presented his teleplay Patterns. The script was about the psychological underside of the era’s celebrated “man in the gray flannel suit.” Most effective was what critic Andrew Sarris called the play’s “anti-cliché ending to end all anti-cliché endings,” in which the idealistic younger executive confronts the company’s ruthless head. The boss refuses to atone for his viciousness, offers the younger man a chance to stay, and the honorable man accepts.

Patterns catapulted Serling into prominence as television’s leading writer. He followed it with other excellent plays, most notably Requiem for a Heavyweight for Playhouse 90 in 1956. But while Serling was at the top of his profession, many of the medium’s other leading writers were leaving the business, incensed by sponsor interference with the content of the shows. Advertisers wanted upbeat programs, reasoning these would sell more products. By 1959, CBS was under the dominion of network president James Aubrey whose business philosophy was “The more interesting the programming content of a television show is, the more it interferes with the commercial message.”

In this atmosphere it is amazing that CBS accepted The Twilight Zone. The network brass probably were relieved Serling would be preoccupied with his fantasy series. But the show remained topical. It was, for instance, the first time television portrayed a nuclear war in the 1959 episode Time Enough at Last. As Carol Serling said, “The TV censors left him alone, either because they didn’t understand what he was doing or believed that he was truly in outer space.” But Serling earned the enmity of Aubrey, who was determined to rid CBS of The Twilight Zone.

After the show’s cancellation in 1964, Serling never recaptured the form that had made him the top in his profession. Sander traces his last years until his death in 1975, where Serling was reduced to shilling products like Anacin, Crest and Echo Floor Wax, as well as hosting such insipid game shows as Rod Serling’s Liar’s Club. In a Twilight Zone-style twist, Serling seemed caught in one of his own plays, like Mountain McClintock, the former boxing champion reduced to working as a professional wrestler in Requiem for a Heavyweight. Or, as one character warns the successful television writer in Serling’s 1959 play The Velvet Alley, “You know how they do it? They give you a thousand dollars a week, and they keep giving it to you until you can’t live without it. Then they start to talk about taking it away, and there isn’t anything you won’t do to keep that thousand dollars a week.”

Serling ranks in importance with such people as Edward R. Murrow, Lucille Ball and Ernie Kovacs as a television pioneer. Sander provides a useful introduction to Serling’s legacy, as well as the growth of the medium that has revolutionized virtually every facet of American life in the past 50 years.

No comments:

Post a Comment